In January 2020, I began reviewing books for
HorrorTree.COM. I didn’t take this
opportunity lightly, and it wasn’t a selfless act on my part. I thought I could help others, as well as
myself, to become increasingly better writers through the process.
Who do I think I am? How am I qualified to review books? My resume includes an Associates Degree in
Communications and the Arts. I have been
a contributing writer to the Press and Journal publication, Dauphin
County Woman for nine years. My
editor takes the liberty of editing my work as she sees fit. Sometimes my reaction has been, “Oh yeah – it
needed that.” Other edits have brought
on physical illness and sniffles.
However, I’ve never had a reader tell me they didn’t understand what I was
saying and I’ve often had them tell me what a riot my column was, or how it
made them cry.
What I’m saying is that I understand the editing
process and I get it when my incredible and witty prose doesn’t sound so
wonderful to discerning eyes. I know
that feeling of someone not getting me and thankfully, I have been surrounded by
tough love and constructive criticism throughout my writing career. Both have served me well.
I am not that reviewer who puts down or attacks an
author personally. A few mistakes here
and there won’t make or break achieving one rating over another. It is my job to give an honest
and unbiased opinion. Here is how I use
the five-star rating system.
One Star – A book is problematic on every level. I have yet to assign this rating and I don’t
expect to. I can’t know how excellent an
author thinks their book is when it’s turned in to me, but I am mindful that
their forthcoming reviews may be highly and eagerly anticipated. It remains my job to give a fair
opinion. To get the one-star rating, a
book would have to leave me feeling like the author didn’t care about their
work. It would have to lack correct
usage of basic grammar and adherence to fundamental writing skills. I would question an author’s intent to remain
an author for work deserving of this rating.
Two Stars – A book doesn’t have an interesting enough story
line, but I can tell the author is on to something. It probably has enough grammar and
punctuation errors that it got on my nerves every time it interrupted the flow,
and there was likely too much telling and not enough showing. Although the piece may read like an author’s
first attempt, it has potential.
Three Stars – Ah, the illustrious middle of the road. Is it a bad rating? A good one?
To me, three stars are a good rating with “needs work” attached. The book was rewarding to read. Plot, setting, dialogue, characters all ring
true but there were things that took away from the overall enjoyment. Too many grammar and punctuation errors, too
much passive voice, too much telling without showing would all keep an
otherwise four-star book anchored in three.
Four Stars – The book was an enjoyable read and I would
recommend it to others. It didn’t have
quite the impact it could have to warrant five stars. I may have wanted to give it five stars,
but there were minor problems involving character, plot, etc. or enough grammar
and punctuation mistakes that it interrupted the good time I was having reading
the book.
Five Stars – The book had memorable moments and held my
attention. It had an impact and
something about it stuck with me. There
weren’t issues with point of view or pacing, dialogue rang true. Proficiency in grammar and tools of the writing
craft allowed the story to flow well. I
would recommend the book and would reread it myself.